ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective Literature has reported that language is the most common barrier in a health care setting and a risk factor associated with negative outcomes. The present study reports the differences between nursing students who speak one language and nursing students who speak two or more languages (self-reported language proficiency) and their skills and learning needs in global health. Method An observational cross-sectional study was performed among nursing students from five Ontario universities. A survey was designed to measure knowledge, skills and learning needs in global health. Results Students who speak more than two languages are more likely to have more interest in learning global health issues, such as health risks and their association with travel and migration (p=0.44), and social determinants of health (p=0.042). Conclusion Language training is needed for nursing students to be able to face language barriers in health care settings and improve global health, locally and internationally.(AU)
RESUMEN Objetivo De acuerdo con la literatura, el idioma es el obstáculo más común en el contexto de la atención médica y un factor de riesgo asociado con resultados negativos. El objetivo de este estudio es presentar las diferencias percibidas entre los estudiantes de enfermería que hablan un idioma y aquellos que hablan dos o más (competencia lingüística reportada por ellos mismos) y sus habilidades y necesidades de aprendizaje en salud global. Método Estudio observacional de corte transversal entre estudiantes de enfermería de cinco universidades de Ontario. Se diseñó una encuesta para medir el conocimiento, las habilidades y las necesidades de aprendizaje en salud global. Resultados Se observó que los estudiantes que hablan más de dos idiomas tienen mayor probabilidad de interesarse más en aprender sobre problemas de salud global, los riesgos para la salud y su asociación con los viajes y la migración (p=0,44), así como sobre los determinantes sociales de la salud (p=0,042). Conclusión Es necesario que se brinde capacitación en aprendizaje de otros idiomas a los estudiantes de enfermería para que puedan afrontar las barreras impuestas por el lenguaje en los contextos de atención médica y mejorar la salud global, de manera local e internacional.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Global Health/education , Health Education , Cultural Competency/education , Students, Nursing , Cross-Sectional StudiesABSTRACT
A transparent and evidence-based priority-setting process promotes the optimal use of resources to improve health outcomes. Decision-makers and funders have begun to increasingly engage representatives of patients and healthcare consumers to ensure that research becomes more relevant. However, disadvantaged groups and their needs may not be integrated into the priority-setting process since they do not have a “political voice” or are unable to organise into interest groups. Equitable priority-setting methods need to balance patient needs, values, experiences with population-level issues and issues related to the health system.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: In the new century, worldwide health professionals face new pressures for changes towards more cost-effective and sustainable health care for all populations. Globalization creates daunting challenges as well as new opportunities for institutions and health professionals being more connected and rethink their strategies toward an inter professional practice. Although Health professionals are paying increased attention to issues of global health, there are no current assessment tools appropriate for evaluating their competency in global health. This study aimed to assess global health competencies of family medicine residents, nursing, physiotherapy and occupational therapy students. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted in five universities across Ontario, Canada. The online survey drew from 429 participants, including students and residents between May to October 2011. The surveys were previously evaluated for face and content validity and reliability. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to evaluate the quantitative data. The level of significance was set at 5%. Results: Self-reported knowledge and confidence in global health issues and global health skills were low for family medicine residents, nursing, physiotherapy and occupational therapy students. The percentage of residents and students who selfreported as confident was less than 60% for all global health issues. Conclusion: This study also highlights a need for the development of interdisciplinary education in global health. The new century requires professionals competent in global health. Institutions must offer interprofessional approaches and a curriculum that exposes them to varied learning methods and opportunities to improve their knowledge and skills in global health.